Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Quinney Electric, Inc. v. Kondos Entertainment, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quinney Electric, Inc. v. Kondos Entertainment, Inc. Anchor | green | “previously litigated and lost.” | 7 |
| 2 | Van Dyke v. Boswell, O'Toole, Davis & Pickering | green | “the basic function of collateral estoppel is to prevent a party from relitigating an issue that the party previously litigated and lost.” | 3 |
| 3 | Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company v. Evans | green | “an advance agreement about venue may not contravene the statutory scheme for fixing venue.” | 3 |
| 4 | Fidelity Union Life Insurance Company v. Evans | green | “the fixing of venue by contract, except in such instances as permitted by article 1995, 5 creating an exception to the general venue statute when a person has contracted in writing to perform an obligation in a particular county is invalid and cannot be the subject of private c…” | 3 |
| 5 | Quinney Electric, Inc. v. Kondos Entertainment, Inc. | green | “the basic function of collateral estoppel is to prevent a party from relitigating an issue that the party previously litigated and lost.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.