Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Garcia v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garcia v. State Anchor | green | “as long as the facts and circumstances show a valid and legal detention, it serves no actual fourth amendment function to attempt to unearth the subjective reasons for such detention.” | 5 |
| 2 | Jones v. State | green | “generally likely to have a profound impact on a jury, especially at the guilt stage of a trial.” | 4 |
| 3 | Montemayor v. State | green | “fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine” | 4 |
| 4 | Martinez v. State | green | “postwarning statements related to the substance of prewarning statements must be excluded unless curative measures are taken before the postwarning statement is made.” | 3 |
| 5 | Span v. United States | green | “but whether there is a reasonable possibility that the erroneously admitted evidence contributed to the verdict obtained.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.