Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fulton Dental, LLC v. Bisco, Inc. Anchor | green | “the core purpose of rule 67 is to relieve a party who holds a contested fund from responsibility for disbursement of that fund among those claiming some entitlement thereto.” | 4 |
| 2 | People Express Airlines, Inc. v. Consolidated Rail Corp. | green | “the cases . . . involve tort claims by innocent third parties who suffered purely economic losses at the hands of negligent defendants with whom no direct relationship existed.” | 3 |
| 3 | Anderson v. Modica | green | “must relate to a present or preexisting fact and cannot ordinarily be predicated on representations which involve things to be done in the future.” | 3 |
| 4 | Anderson v. Modica | green | “the alleged representation to induce a retention of the customers was a promise to perform an act in the future and is not in a legal sense a representation.” | 3 |
| 5 | Westmont Development Group, LLC v. Township of Haddon | green | “is not cognizable as between commercial parties engaged in a direct contractual relationship resulting from arms- length negotiations” | 3 |
| 6 | Jarzyna v. Home Properties, L.P. | green | “unless an applicable statute requires the deposit of funds without leave of court, no money shall be sent to the court or its officers for deposit into the court's registry without a court order by the judge assigned to the case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.