Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Quinones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Quinones Anchor | green | “sufficiently similar in appearance so that the viewer's attention was not drawn to any one photograph in such a way as to indicate that the police were urging a particular selection” | 5 |
| 2 | People v. Quinones | green | “the subjects depicted in the photo array were sufficiently similar in appearance so that the viewer's attention was not drawn to any one photograph in such a way as to indicate that the police were urging a particular selection,” | 5 |
| 3 | People v. Snyder | green | “utterly at odds with his claim of innocent possession . . . temporarily and incidentally resulting from . . . disarming a wrongful possessor” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Fewell | green | “differences in skin tone alone will not render a lineup unduly suggestive” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Myers | green | “absent proof that such witness would have provided noncumulative testimony which was favorable to the prosecution, there was no basis for such a charge” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.