Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Hutchings v. Vanderbilt University.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hutchings v. Vanderbilt University Anchor | green | “courts are not inclined to review educational malpractice claims or breach of contract claims based on inadequate educational services” | 4 |
| 2 | Hamilton v. Ball | green | “the proper remedy for consumers seeking redress against unfair, deceptive, or unconscionable acts in the sale of consumer goods or services is through the cspa” | 3 |
| 3 | Rockwood v. Shoen | green | “courts are not inclined to review educational malpractice claims or breach of contract claims based on inadequate educational services” | 3 |
| 4 | Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC | green | “the dtpa addresses commercial injury, and not consumer injury (which is addressed by the cspa)” | 3 |
| 5 | Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc. | green | “a consumer does not have standing to sue under the dtpa” | 3 |
| 6 | Phillips v. Philip Morris Companies Inc. | green | “the dtpa addresses commercial injury, and not consumer injury (which is addressed by the cspa)” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.