Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Commonwealth v. Quinones.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Commonwealth v. Quinones Anchor | green | “when reviewing the denial of a motion for a required finding of not guilty, 'we consider the evidence introduced at trial in the light most favorable to the commonwealth, and determine whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a…” | 11 |
| 2 | Commonwealth v. Sousa | green | “the inferences that support a conviction 'need only be reasonable and possible; they need not be necessary or inescapable.” | 5 |
| 3 | Commonwealth v. Quinones | green | “whether a rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.