Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McDonald, E. v. Whitewater Challengers, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McDonald, E. v. Whitewater Challengers, Inc. Anchor | green | “an order denying summary judgment is ordinarily a non-appealable interlocutory order.” | 7 |
| 2 | Shearer, D., Aplts. v. Hafer, S. | green | “construe the collateral order doctrine narrowly, and insist that each one of its three prongs be 'clearly present' before collateral appellate review is allowed.” | 6 |
| 3 | Calabretta, C. v. Guidi Homes Inc. | green | “an order is separable from the main cause of action if it is entirely distinct from the underlying issue in the case and if it can be resolved without an analysis of the merits of the underlying dispute.” | 3 |
| 4 | Calabretta, C. v. Guidi Homes Inc. | green | “entirely distinct from the underlying issue in the case” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.