Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Joint Venture of Comint Systems Corp. v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Joint Venture of Comint Systems Corp. v. United States Anchor | green | “it is well settled that the 'primary focus' of the court's review of agency decision making 'should be the materials that were before the agency when it made its final decision.” | 6 |
| 2 | Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United States | green | “granting agencies the authority to retroactively create an administrative record once the adversarial process has commenced, however, 'may preclude the "substantial inquiry” | 4 |
| 3 | AgustaWestland North America, Inc. v. United States | green | “required to explain why the evidence omitted from the record frustrates judicial review as to the ultimate question of whether the award . . . was arbitrary and capricious.” | 3 |
| 4 | Cubic Applications, Inc. v. United States | green | “in order to preserve a meaningful judicial review, the parties must be able to suggest the need for other evidence . . . aimed at determining . . . whether the record provides an adequate explanation to the protestor or the court as to the basis of the agency action.” | 3 |
| 5 | Vanguard Recovery Assistance v. United States | green | “to perform an effective review pursuant to the administrative procedure act ('apa'), the court must have a record containing the information upon which the agency relied when it made its decision as well as any documentation revealing the agency's decision-making process.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.