Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings, LLC Anchor | green | “such a suit does not seek to disturb the judgment of the state court, but to obtain damages for the unlawful conduct that misled the court into issuing the judgment.” | 4 |
| 2 | United States v. Syed Ahmad | green | “a search au- thorized by consent is wholly valid.” | 3 |
| 3 | Johnson v. Pushpin Holdings, LLC | green | “does not bar a federal suit that seeks damages for a fraud that resulted in a judgment adverse” | 3 |
| 4 | Podemski v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n | green | “the rooker- feldman doctrine does not have a fraud exception.” | 3 |
| 5 | Aneta Hadzi-Tanovic v. Robert Johnson | green | “alleged 'a massive, tentacular conspiracy' by the defendants to 'engineer' his defeat in state court.” | 3 |
| 6 | Sarah Hohenberg v. Shelby Cnty., Tenn. | green | “a complaint demanding 'compensatory damages' does not 'seek review or reversal' of a court order awarding relief not measured by money.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.