Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Manini.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Manini Anchor | green | “the people must show that the defendant exercised 'dominion or control' over the property by a sufficient level of control over the area in which the contraband is found or over the person from whom the contraband is seized” | 12 |
| 2 | People v. Wilson | green | “the informant existed and that he provided the information to the police concerning the presence of a gun at the specified location” | 4 |
| 3 | People v. Manini | green | “in new york, the rule has long been that to support a charge that a defendant was in constructive possession of tangible property, the people must show that the defendant exercised 'dominion or control' over the property by a sufficient level of control over the area in which th…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.