Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 19 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Candelaria.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Candelaria Anchor | green | “a parolee's status ought not to be exploited to allow a search which is designed solely to collect contraband or evidence in aid of the prosecution of an independent criminal investigation” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Candelaria | green | “designed solely to collect contraband or evidence in aid of the prosecution of an independent criminal investigation” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Escalera | green | “merely a conduit for doing what the police could not do otherwise” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Escalera | green | “received credible information from law enforcement sources that defendant possessed a large quantity of cocaine in his” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Pierce | green | “by pleading guilty, defendant forfeited review of supreme court's molineux and sandoval rulings” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.