Topic: a 'final judgment' for purposes of collateral estoppel can … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #22381

6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Miller Brewing Company v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Miller Brewing Company v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co. Anchor
ca7 · 1979
green “a 'final judgment' for purposes of collateral estoppel can be any prior adjudication 15 of an issue in another action that is determined to be 'sufficiently firm' to be accorded conclusive 16 effect.” 3
2 Luben Industries, Inc. v. United States
ca9 · 1983
green “a 'final judgment' for purposes of collateral estoppel can be any prior adjudication 15 of an issue in another action that is determined to be 'sufficiently firm' to be accorded conclusive 16 effect.” 3
3 Environmental Protection Information Center, Inc. v. Pacific Lumber Company
ca9 · 2001
green “the decision 6 must be appealed or appealable” 3
4 Safeworks, LLC v. Teupen America, LLC
wawd · 2010
green “absent unusual circumstances, the analysis of a cpa claim will follow that of the trademark infringement” 3
5 Stephen Yagman v. Eric Garcetti
ca9 · 2017
green “in 4 dismissing for failure to state a claim, a district court should grant leave to amend even if no 5 request to amend the pleading was made, unless it determines that the pleading could not 6 possibly be cured by the allegation of other facts.” 3
6 Free Kick Master LLC v. Apple Inc.
cand · 2015
green “self-reinforcing enforcement regime” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check