Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Martin Joseph Sonnier v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Martin Joseph Sonnier v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division Anchor | green | “compliance with the coa requirement of 28 u.s.c. 2253 (c) is jurisdictional, and the lack of a ruling on a coa in the district court causes this court to be without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.” | 7 |
| 2 | Crone v. Cockrell | green | “1) raises a claim challenging the petitioner's conviction or sentence that was or could have been raised in an earlier petition; or 2) otherwise constitutes an abuse of the writ.” | 3 |
| 3 | Ochoa Canales v. Quarterman | green | “not the substance of the federal court's resolution of a claim on the merits, but some defect in the integrity of the federal habeas proceedings.” | 3 |
| 4 | Martin Joseph Sonnier v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division | green | “compliance with the coa requirement of 28 u.s.c. 2253 (c) is jurisdictional and the lack of a ruling on a coa in the district court causes this court to be without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.” | 3 |
| 5 | Martin Joseph Sonnier v. Gary L. Johnson, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division | green | “the lack of a ruling on a coa in the district court causes this court to be without jurisdiction to consider the appeal.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.