Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Means v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Means v. United States Anchor | green | “had discretion regarding the entry and security of the premises,” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Edward C. Becker, Administrator of the Estate of Ernest J. Becker, Deceased | green | “when and where to go and what to do” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Edward C. Becker, Administrator of the Estate of Ernest J. Becker, Deceased | green | “when and where to go and what to do.” | 3 |
| 4 | Larry Michael Slagle v. United States | green | “in general the activities of an informant are not subject to the actual control or right of control of a federal agent.” | 3 |
| 5 | Jack Leaf and Marvin Gunnufson, and Cross-Appellants v. United States of America, and Cross-Appellee | green | “knowledge and approval of the dea agents assigned to supervise him.” | 3 |
| 6 | Patricia M. Letnes v. United States | green | “significantly different factual setting.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.