Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shinn v. Commissioner of Social Security.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shinn v. Commissioner of Social Security Anchor | green | “a child's impairment is 'of listing-level severity,' and so 'functionally equals the listings,' if as a result of the limitations stemming from that impairment the child has 'marked limitations in two of the domains above, or an extreme limitation in one domain.” | 6 |
| 2 | Shinn v. Commissioner of Social Security | green | “objective criteria set forth in the regulations” | 6 |
| 3 | TRC v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration | green | “the alj assesses the degree to which the child's limitations interfere with the child's normal life activities,” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.