Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lámar v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lámar v. United States Anchor | green | “the court had no jurisdiction because the indictment does not charge a crime against the united states.” | 9 |
| 2 | Lámar v. United States | green | “the objection that the indictment does not charge a crime against the united states goes only to the merits of the case.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Williams | green | “that the indictment is defective does not affect the jurisdiction of the trial court to determine the case presented by the indictment.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.