Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cummings v. HPG International, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cummings v. HPG International, Inc. Anchor | green | “proof of intent to deceive is not required, so long as there is proof of a false representation of fact susceptible of the speaker's knowledge.” | 7 |
| 2 | Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | green | “under massachusetts law, fraud requires that the defendant made a knowingly false statement concerning a material matter that was intended to, and did in fact, induce the plaintiff's reliance and, through that reliance, created an injury.” | 7 |
| 3 | Gutierrez v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority | green | “a plaintiff must demonstrate that 'a combination of persons acted pursuant to an agreement to injure the plaintiff.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.