Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from National Enterprises, Inc. v. Paul Smith.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | National Enterprises, Inc. v. Paul Smith Anchor | green | “the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 5 |
| 2 | Federated Management Co. v. Coopers & Lybrand | green | “ohio does not recognize a claim for aiding and abetting common-law fraud.” | 5 |
| 3 | Young v. International Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers | green | “ratification may be implied when there is actual knowledge of an agreement, acceptance of its benefits and a failure to repudiate within a reasonable time.” | 5 |
| 4 | Pavlovich v. National City Bank | green | “by accepting its actions and their consequences over the course of several years.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.