Topic: the joining of the claims of numerous, dispersed claimants … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #22591

6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from The State of California, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, and as Parens Patriae v. Frito-Lay, Inc..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 The State of California, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, and as Parens Patriae v. Frito-Lay, Inc. Anchor
ca9 · 1973
green “the joining of the claims of numerous, dispersed claimants in a single judicial action is inherently complicated and requires safeguards if injustice is to be avoided.” 3
2 People of State of Illinois v. Home Federal Savings and Loan Association
ca7 · 1975
green “a state, like any plaintiff-representative, may maintain a class action on behalf of its citizens only if it satisfies the requirements of rule 23,” 3
3 Kelley v. Sclater (In Re Sclater)
mieb · 1984
green “bring a class action on behalf of persons residing in or injured in this state.” 3
4 Perry v. Del Rio
tex · 2001
green “classic grant of statutory parens patriae authority to the attorney general to protect the interest of texas insureds.” 3
5 Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Petty Ex Rel. Kauffman
texapp · 1989
green “a member of the insurance buying public who has been damaged by an unlawful method, act, or practice.” 3
6 State Teachers Retirement Board v. Fluor Corp.
nysd · 1976
green “in the shoes of a substantial number of purchasers of the drugs” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check