Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Benshoff v. City of Virginia Beach.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benshoff v. City of Virginia Beach Anchor | green | “the rights of those who toil, of those who sacrifice a full measure of their freedom and talents to the use and profit of others.” | 5 |
| 2 | Bonnette v. California Health And Welfare Agency | green | “circumstances of the whole activity.” | 4 |
| 3 | Donovan v. Bel-Loc Diner | green | “frequently granted back wages under the flsa to non-testifying employees based upon the representative testimony of a small percentage of the employees.” | 3 |
| 4 | Herman v. Mid-Atlantic Installation Services, Inc. | green | “by improving their technique so that they can service more customers faster” | 3 |
| 5 | Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp. | green | “take into account the real economic relationship between the employer who uses and benefits from the services of workers and the party that hires or assigns the workers to that employer.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.