Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cleta Heft v. Cody Moore, Carl Carpenter, Ed Root, Jeff McClain and Ric Hughes.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cleta Heft v. Cody Moore, Carl Carpenter, Ed Root, Jeff McClain and Ric Hughes Anchor | green | “excessive or unnecessary destruction of property in the course of a search may violate the fourth amendment, even though the entry itself is lawful and the fruits of the search are not subject to suppression.” | 8 |
| 2 | Viilo v. Eyre | green | “the use of deadly force against a household pet is reasonable only if the pet poses an immediate danger and the use of force is unavoidable.” | 6 |
| 3 | Viilo v. Eyre | green | “every circuit that has considered the issue has held that the killing of a companion dog constitutes a 'seizure' within the meaning of the fourth amendment.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.