Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Alphonso Chinnery v. Government of the Virgin Islands.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alphonso Chinnery v. Government of the Virgin Islands Anchor | green | “other workers compensation legislation, is designed to 'provide prompt payment of benefits without regard to fault.” | 3 |
| 2 | William Rolick v. Collins Pine Company, and Collins Pine Company, T/d/b/a Kane Hardwood Division | green | “to protect invitees from non-obvious dangerous conditions on the land.” | 3 |
| 3 | Koutoufaris v. Dick | green | “343a's apparent espousal of assumption of risk as a bar to recovery” | 3 |
| 4 | Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc. | green | “are often beyond the owner's expertise.” | 3 |
| 5 | Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc. | green | “common sense permits a landowner to identify the potential of harm which an activity may create to persons not participating in the activity.” | 3 |
| 6 | Zueck v. Oppenheimer Gateway Properties, Inc. | green | “the fact that the economic system permits workers who presume to undertake dangerous work to bargain for an enhanced reward for assuming the danger.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.