Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Lopez de Victoria.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Lopez de Victoria Anchor | green | “all cases reviewed by a court of criminal appeals in which, upon petition of the accused and on good cause shown, the court of appeals for the armed forces has granted a review.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Lopez de Victoria | green | “uniformity in the application of the code among the military services.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. Lopez de Victoria | green | “congress legislated against a judicial backdrop that already provided for a broad reading of jurisdiction over 'cases' . . . whether arising through certi- fication . . . or by petition.” | 3 |
| 4 | Center for Constitutional Rights v. United States | green | “the harm alleged ... has the potential to directly affect the findings and sentence.” | 3 |
| 5 | United States v. LaBella | green | “read the statutes governing our jurisdiction as an integrated whole, with the purpose of carrying out the intent of congress in enacting them.” | 3 |
| 6 | EV v. United States | green | “the plain language of that article and the absence of any other express or implied congressional intent to bestow authority upon us.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.