Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Lane.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Lane Anchor | green | “generally, a cause of action for negligence does not accrue until the existence of a redressable harm or injury has been established and the injured party knows or should know of either the injury or the negligent act.” | 9 |
| 2 | T & B Scottdale Contractors, Inc. v. United States | green | “significant judicial activity involving considerable discretion,” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Gibson Group, Inc. | green | “the purpose of chapter 11 is to provide a debtor with legal protection in order to give him the opportunity to reorganize, and thereby to provide creditors with going-concern value rather than the possibility of a more meager satisfaction through liquidation.” | 3 |
| 4 | Collins v. Federal Land Bank of Omaha | green | “to discern how any adverse economic consequences produced by the chapter 7 election rather than a chapter 11 could have impacted on the collinses until after the chapter 7 petition was filed.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.