Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean Water.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Railroad Commission v. Texas Citizens for a Safe Future & Clean Water Anchor | green | “read the statute as a whole and interpret it to give effect to every part.” | 11 |
| 2 | City of Austin v. Harry M. Whittington | green | “we will not reverse an erroneous conclusion if the trial court rendered the proper judgment.” | 4 |
| 3 | Susan Combs, Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas And Greg Abbott, Attorney General of the State of Texas v. Newpark Resources, Inc. | green | “tax on the value and privilege of doing business in texas” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.