Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee Anchor | green | “in criminal contempt proceedings, the defendant is presumed to be innocent and must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 7 |
| 2 | Doe v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of Tennessee | green | “the quantum of proof necessary to convict is a preponderance of the evidence.” | 6 |
| 3 | Thigpen v. Thigpen | green | “bears the burden of overcoming their presumption of guilt on appeal.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.