Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Litzler v. Cc Investments.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Litzler v. Cc Investments Anchor | green | “a claim that affects long-settled transactions might hang forever over honest persons.” | 3 |
| 2 | Andrew J. Orkin F. Mark Orkin Sarah-Rose Josepha Adler A. Heinrich Zille v. Elizabeth Taylor | green | “approximate state law as closely as possible in order to make sure that the vindication of the state right is without discrimination because of the federal forum.” | 3 |
| 3 | Roth v. Reyes | green | “supports the goals of disclosure and transparency” | 3 |
| 4 | Dreiling v. America Online Inc. | green | “congress enacted section 16(b) as part of the exchange act to prevent corporate insiders from exploiting their access to information not generally available to others.” | 3 |
| 5 | Levine v. Smith | green | “the board has better access to the relevant facts” | 3 |
| 6 | In Re Section 16 (B) Litigation | green | “the company's ipo underwriters, in addition to certain of its officers, directors and principal shareholders, as identified in the ipo prospectus.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.