Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Frank Barrett v. Nancy I. Harrington, A/K/A Penny Harrington.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Frank Barrett v. Nancy I. Harrington, A/K/A Penny Harrington Anchor | green | “it would make little sense, and only promote form over substance, for us to say that a judge's response in redressing threatening conduct which she physically observes (e.g., contempt) is entitled to the cloak of judicial immunity, but her action in redressing a threat arising i…” | 3 |
| 2 | General Media Communications, Inc. v. Cohen | green | “governmental intent is said to be the touchstone of forum analysis.” | 3 |
| 3 | General Media Communications, Inc. v. Cohen | green | “need only be reasonable in light of the purpose of the forum and reflect a legitimate government concern.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Allen | green | “secure both the proper transaction and dispatch of business and the respect and obedience due to the court and necessary for the administration of justice.” | 3 |
| 5 | Huminski v. RUTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. | green | “the general rule that judges act in a judicial capacity whenever they order the removal of persons from their courtroom who disrupt or otherwise negatively impact the judicial process” | 3 |
| 6 | Huminski v. RUTLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. | green | “there is no support for predom's suggestion that the initial notice was legally superceded or voided by virtue of the second trespass notice.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.