Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Circus Circus Hotels, Inc. v. Witherspoon.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Circus Circus Hotels, Inc. v. Witherspoon Anchor | green | “to quasi-judicial proceedings before executive officers, boards, and commissions.” | 3 |
| 2 | Circus Circus Hotels, Inc. v. Witherspoon | green | “has been extended to quasi-judicial proceedings before executive officers, boards, and commissions.” | 3 |
| 3 | Hamm v. Carson City Nugget, Inc. | green | “the common law rule is the rule of decision in our courts unless in conflict with constitutional or statutory commands.” | 3 |
| 4 | Lubin v. Kunin | green | “but may or may not be applicable to the case when properly raised and fully presented to the district court” | 3 |
| 5 | Lubin v. Kunin | green | “if the district court determines that the privilege is applicable, the action for defamation will be presented to the jury only if there is sufficient evidence for the jury reasonably to infer that the publication was made with malice in fact.” | 3 |
| 6 | Lubin v. Kunin | green | “is a question of law for the court.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.