Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Antonio Darnell Robinson v. John Ignacio, Warden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Antonio Darnell Robinson v. John Ignacio, Warden Anchor | green | “last reasoned decision by a state court.” | 5 |
| 2 | State v. Staten | green | “requiring a defendant to choose between waiving counsel and continuing with present counsel is not constitutionally offensive unless defendant's objections to existing counsel are such that he has a right to new counsel.” | 4 |
| 3 | United States v. Carl Dexter Moore | green | “a tone of voice emulating force and threats” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Carl Dexter Moore | green | “it seems to me that if mr. moore is forced to go to trial now with me as his attorney, that he will be denied a fundamental right; that is, to have counsel, effective, a zealous counsel” | 3 |
| 5 | Wayne Dale Schell v. Larry Witek, Warden Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, State of California, 1 | green | “arose over decisions that are committed to the judgment of the attorney and not the client,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.