Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sicom Systems Ltd. v. Agilent Technologies, Inc., and Tektronix, Inc., and Lecroy Corporation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sicom Systems Ltd. v. Agilent Technologies, Inc., and Tektronix, Inc., and Lecroy Corporation Anchor | green | “standing to sue is a threshold requirement in every federal action.” | 8 |
| 2 | Paradise Creations, Inc. v. Uv Sales, Inc. | green | “to assert standing for patent infringement, the plaintiff must demonstrate that it held enforceable title to the patent at the inception of the lawsuit.” | 4 |
| 3 | Paradise Creations, Inc. v. Uv Sales, Inc. | green | “in order to assert standing for patent infringement, the plaintiff must demonstrate that it held enforceable title to the patent at the inception of the lawsuit.” | 3 |
| 4 | Paradise Creations, Inc. v. Uv Sales, Inc. | green | “this court has determined that in order to assert standing for patent infringement, the plaintiff must demonstrate that it held enforceable title to the patent at the inception of the lawsuit.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.