Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Country Mutual Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Country Mutual Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine Anchor | green | “when construing the language of an insurance policy, a court is to ascertain and give effect to the intentions of the parties as expressed by the words of the policy.” | 9 |
| 2 | Country Mutual Ins. Co. v. Livorsi Marine | green | “although insurance policies are construed liberally in favor of coverage, this rule of construction comes into play only when the policy language is ambiguous.” | 7 |
| 3 | First Insurance Funding Corporation v. Federal Insurance Company | green | “however, when an insurer denies the claim of an insured because no coverage exists, the insurer has not failed to honor its contractual obligations under an insurance policy.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.