Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Woods v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Woods v. State Anchor | green | “the plain import of former rule 25.2(b)(3) is that appeals from plea-bargain cases are limited to the situations set forth in the rule.” | 7 |
| 2 | Waters v. State | green | “despite the trial court's certification that the appellant had the right to appeal, we believe the rule 25.2 requirements recited in a certification must be true and supported by the record.” | 4 |
| 3 | Feagin v. State | green | “attacking the propriety of orders revoking probation.” | 4 |
| 4 | Ramirez v. State | green | “the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.