Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Delahanty.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Delahanty Anchor | green | “a finding of aggravating circumstances or the imposition of a death sentence is not an abuse of discretion if 'there is any reasonable evidence in the record to sustain it.” | 9 |
| 2 | State v. Cota | green | “no reasonable jury could have concluded that the mitigation established by the defendant was not sufficiently substantial to call for leniency.” | 4 |
| 3 | State of Arizona v. Robert Hernandez | green | “to satisfy this burden, the defendant must present evidence of a 'severe and pervasive conflict with his attorney or evidence that he had such minimal contact with the attorney that meaningful communication was not possible.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Snelling | green | “the victim consciously experienced physical or mental pain prior to death, and the defendant knew or should have known that suffering would occur.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.