Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Barnum v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnum v. Williams Anchor | green | “a deliberate violation or disregard on the part of the employee of standards of behavior which his employer has the right to expect.” | 5 |
| 2 | Kraft v. Nevada Employment Security Department | green | “there must be a point when inaction can only be viewed as the product of indifference.” | 5 |
| 3 | Kraft v. Nevada Employment Security Department | green | “even if we disagreed with the agency's finding, we would be powerless to set it aside” | 4 |
| 4 | Clark County School District v. Bundley | green | “shifts to the former employee to demonstrate that the conduct cannot be characterized as misconduct within the meaning of nrs 612.385, for example, by explaining the conduct and showing that it was reasonable and justified under the circumstances.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.