Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from deElche v. Jacobsen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | deElche v. Jacobsen Anchor | green | “does not exist as a separate and distinct juristic entity.” | 3 |
| 2 | deElche v. Jacobsen | green | “illogical, inconsistent and unjust results” | 3 |
| 3 | LaFramboise v. Schmidt | neutral | “either (1) results or is intended to result in a benefit to the community or (2) is committed in the prosecution of the business of the community.” | 3 |
| 4 | LaFramboise v. Schmidt | neutral | “they were done in the course of the community's business, and the community is, therefore, liable for them.” | 3 |
| 5 | Keene v. Edie | green | “the tortfeasor's separate property and share of community personal property are insufficient to satisfy the judgment.” | 3 |
| 6 | Francom v. Costco Wholesale Corp. | green | “certainly was not within the scope of mr. hathaway's employment” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.