Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 130 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Charles Curry v. Revolution Laboratories, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles Curry v. Revolution Laboratories, LLC Anchor | green | “the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating the existence of jurisdiction.” | 34 |
| 2 | Robert Felland v. Patrick Clifton | green | “reads the complaint liberally with every inference drawn in favor of the plaintiff,” | 26 |
| 3 | GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund v. Goldfarb Corp. | green | “any factual disputes in the parties' affidavits in favor of the plaintiff,” | 24 |
| 4 | Tai Matlin v. Spin Master Corp. | green | “evidence opposing the district court's exercise of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff must similarly submit affirmative evidence supporting the court's exercise of jurisdiction.” | 24 |
| 5 | Charles Curry v. Revolution Laboratories, LLC | green | “once the defendant moves to dismiss the complaint under federal rule of civil procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating the existence of jurisdiction.” | 11 |
| 6 | Charles Curry v. Revolution Laboratories, LLC | green | “the plaintiff need not include facts alleging personal jurisdiction in the complaint, but 'once the defendant moves to dismiss the complaint under federal rule of civil procedure 12(b)(2) for lack of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating the exis…” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.