4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 12 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re: Alphonso Michael (Mike) Espy.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re: Alphonso Michael (Mike) Espy Anchor | green | “ur power to make such referral is much more limited than the broad referral power of the attorney general.” | 3 |
| 2 | United States v. Blackley, Ronald H. | green | “iolations of manual policies by doj attorneys or other federal prosecutors afford a defendant no enforceable rights.” | 3 |
| 3 | United States v. George | green | “f an indictment or information alleges the violation of a crime set out in title 18 or in one of the other statutes defining federal crimes, that is the end of the jurisdictional inquiry.” | 3 |
| 4 | United States v. Esco Wilson | green | “department of justice guidelines and policies do not create enforceable rights for criminal defendants.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.