Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Cohen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Cohen Anchor | green | “inevitably elicit incriminating responses” | 3 |
| 2 | People v. Cohen | green | “so closely related transactionally, or in space or time, that questioning on the unrepresented matter would all but inevitably elicit incriminating responses regarding the matter in which there had been an entry of counsel” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. McLean | green | “the record on the direct appeal falls short of establishing conclusively the merit of defendant's claim,” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Freycinet | green | “contemporaneous record of objective facts” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Dawson | green | “by poisoning her with a lethal combination of pharmaceutical substances that were mixed with an alcoholic beverage.” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Curry | green | “the people presented clear and convincing evidence that defendant committed the uncharged murder of her first husband by using a distinctive and unique modus operandi,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.