Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. Anchor | green | “the statute was meant to prevent wrongful acts of culpable officers of a corporation, and was for the protection of the public and particularly those dealing with the corporation.” | 9 |
| 2 | Dae Won Choe v. Chancellor, Inc. | green | “the plain and ordinary meaning of the words in section 171.255,” | 3 |
| 3 | Carbide International, Ltd. v. State | green | “procedural safeguards may now be conceived to be more suitable than the safeguard of strict construction to protect the interests of individuals in not being subjected to undeserved punishment.” | 3 |
| 4 | Schwab v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. | green | “must be strictly construed and not extended beyond the clear import of its literal language.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.