Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 129 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Leon Modrowski v. John Pigatto.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leon Modrowski v. John Pigatto Anchor | green | “come forward with evidence that would reasonably permit the finder of fact to find in its favor on a material question.” | 52 |
| 2 | Talanda v. KFC National Management Co. | green | “summary judgment should be denied if the dispute is 'genuine': 'if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” | 30 |
| 3 | Jennifer Beardsall v. CVS Pharmacy, Incorporated | green | “summary judgment is the proverbial put up or shut up moment in a lawsuit, when a party must show what evidence it has that would convince a trier of fact to accept its version of events.” | 19 |
| 4 | McGRATH v. GILLIS | green | “come forward with evidence that would reasonably permit the finder of fact to find in its favor on a material question.” | 16 |
| 5 | Warren Johnson v. Advocate Health and Hospitals | green | “inferences supported only by speculation or conjecture will not suffice.” | 12 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.