Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Agramonte.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Agramonte Anchor | green | “very narrow category of so-called 'mode of proceedings' errors” | 7 |
| 2 | People v. Patterson | green | “to the essential validity of the proceedings conducted below” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Webb | green | “the sequestration requirement does not 'entail a part of the process . . . essential to the form and conduct of the actual trial” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Smith | green | “in addition, 'the fact that defendant's sentence was greater than that of his codefendants, who accepted plea agreements, does not substantiate his contention that he was improperly punished for going to trial” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Agramonte | green | “only fundamental defects in judicial proceedings, however, fall within this very narrow category of so-called 'mode of proceedings' errors” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.