Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Weider.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Weider Anchor | green | “the importance attached to any circumstance or combination of circumstances in a particular case is left to the judgment of the panel.” | 3 |
| 2 | In Re Scott | green | “under the 'some evidence' standard of review, the parole authority's interpretation of the evidence must be upheld if it is reasonable, in the sense that it is not arbitrary, and reflects due consideration of the relevant factors.” | 3 |
| 3 | In Re Smith | green | “an expectation that they will be granted parole unless the board finds, in the exercise of its discretion, that they are unsuitable for parole in light of the circumstances specified by statute and by regulation.” | 3 |
| 4 | Chantiles v. Lake Forest II Master Homeowners Ass'n | green | “it is appropriate for an appellate court to exercise its discretion to retain and decide an issue that is technically moot where, as in this case, 'the issue is "presented in the context of a controversy so short-lived as to evade normal appellate review” | 3 |
| 5 | In re Ryner | green | “might spank her on the butt . . . to make her quit hitting him,” | 3 |
| 6 | In re Poole | green | “lawrence and shaputis i 'clarified that in evaluating a parole-suitability determination by either the board or the governor, a reviewing court focuses upon "some evidence” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.