Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Elken.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Elken Anchor | green | “cannot be expected to jump up at a hearing and voice his objections while his attorney is actively arguing against his interests.” | 4 |
| 2 | People v. Kuehner | green | “effectively an ex post request to deny the defendant” | 3 |
| 3 | People v. Greer | green | “the fact that counsel has been granted leave to withdraw does not mean that the postconviction petition is dismissed.” | 3 |
| 4 | People v. Greer | green | “the state is required to file an answer or a motion to dismiss” | 3 |
| 5 | People v. Sherman | green | “the state is required to file an answer or a motion to dismiss” | 3 |
| 6 | People v. Thomas | green | “successor counsel would be obliged to withdraw for precisely the same reasons that led his or her predecessor to withdraw.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.