Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 17 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Salome Fierros v. Texas Department of Health.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Salome Fierros v. Texas Department of Health Anchor | green | “in such 'direct evidence' cases, 'the burden of proof shifts to the employer to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made regardless of the forbidden factor.” | 5 |
| 2 | Jones v. Overnite Transportation Co. | green | “direct evidence proves intentional discrimination without inference or presumption when believed by the trier of fact.” | 4 |
| 3 | Larry W. Moore and Naomi S. Moore v. United States Department of Agriculture on Behalf of Farmers Home Administration | green | “bypass the mcdonnell douglas burden-shifting framework discussed infra commonly applied in discrimination cases and proceed directly to the question of liability.” | 4 |
| 4 | Thompson v. Exxon Mobil Corp. | green | “a demonstration of substantial similarity generally requires a showing that a common supervisor was involved in the decision making” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.