Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cherryl Kirilenko-Ison v. Bd. of Ed. Danville Independent.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cherryl Kirilenko-Ison v. Bd. of Ed. Danville Independent Anchor | green | “a dispute of a material fact is genuine so long as the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.” | 7 |
| 2 | Cherryl Kirilenko-Ison v. Bd. of Ed. Danville Independent | green | “when evaluating a motion for summary judgment, this court views the evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” | 7 |
| 3 | Richard Rose v. State Farm Fire & Cas.Co. | green | “we review a district court order granting summary judgment under a de novo standard of review, without deference to the decision of the lower court.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.