Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re the Personal Restraint of Greening.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re the Personal Restraint of Greening Anchor | green | “where an intervening opinion has effectively overturned a prior appellate decision that was originally determinative of a material issue.” | 3 |
| 2 | State v. Yokley | green | “that a deportation proceeding that occurs subsequent to the entry of a guilty plea is merely a collateral consequence of that plea.” | 3 |
| 3 | In re the Personal Restraint of Turay | green | “simply applies settled law to new facts, it does not constitute a significant change in the law.” | 3 |
| 4 | State v. Evans | green | “are those that 'break new ground or impose a new obligation on the states or the federal government or if the result was not dictated by precedent existing at the time the defendant's conviction became final.” | 3 |
| 5 | State v. Sandoval | green | “anything short of an affirmative misrepresentation by counsel of the plea's deportation consequences could not support the plea's withdrawal.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Martinez-Lazo | green | “concluded that the sixth amendment did not require attorneys to inform their clients of a conviction's collateral consequences, including deportation.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.