Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moran v. Grillo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moran v. Grillo Anchor | green | “also permitted . . . to consider current income figures for the tax year not yet completed” | 3 |
| 2 | Moran v. Grillo | green | “is required to begin the calculation with the parent's 'gross (total) income as should have been or should be reported in the most recent federal income tax return” | 3 |
| 3 | Juhasz v. Juhasz | green | “a credit against child support for college expenses is not mandatory but depends upon the facts and circumstances in the particular case, taking into account the needs of the custodial parent to maintain a household and provide certain necessaries” | 3 |
| 4 | Kreiswirth v. Shapiro | green | “health insurance premiums are not the equivalent of 'unreimbursed health care expenses' pursuant to family court act 413 (1) (c) (former ), which was in effect when the judgment of divorce was entered” | 3 |
| 5 | Gansky v. Gansky | green | “as the support magistrate's findings were based on credibility determinations and supported by the record, they should not be disturbed” | 3 |
| 6 | Saladino v. Saladino | green | “the support magistrate did not improvidently exercise her discretion in declining to impute additional income to” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.