Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mendoza-Garcia v. Barr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mendoza-Garcia v. Barr Anchor | green | “circumscribe a noncitizen's ability to elaborate on the details of his claim by instructing him only to answer the questions asked.” | 3 |
| 2 | Jose Trejo Tepas v. Merrick Garland | green | “the immigration judge's failure to develop the record . . . would further support his due process claim, which he indisputably preserved by raising it below.” | 3 |
| 3 | Jose Lopez-Benitez v. Merrick Garland | green | “an applicant doesn't need to conjure any magic words to adequately raise an issue to the board.” | 3 |
| 4 | Jose Lopez-Benitez v. Merrick Garland | green | “must at least launch the appropriate argument.” | 3 |
| 5 | David Annor v. Merrick Garland | green | “aggravated felonies for which the noncitizen has been sentenced to an aggregate term . . . of at least five years.” | 3 |
| 6 | Alex Zalaya Orellana v. Pamela Bondi | green | “when an agency fails to follow its own procedures or regulations, that agency's actions are generally invalid” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.