Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 18 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side: they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Quiles Hernández v. Del Valle.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quiles Hernández v. Del Valle Anchor | green | “el beneficio de la libertad bajo palabra no es un derecho reclamable, sino un privilegio cuya concesión y administración recae en el tribunal o en la junta” | 11 |
| 2 | Maldonado Elías v. González Rivera | green | “sujeto al cumplimiento de las condiciones que se impongan para conceder la libertad” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment: for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.